Is 2013 shaping up to be the Year of the Initial Public Offering?
Well, probably not, but IPO deal flow is trending up this year. According to the Federal Securities Law Reports, the 96 IPOs completed during the first two quarters of 2013 is the highest mid-year total since the first half of 2007 saw 141 IPOs completed. Unfortunately, those 96 IPOs in the first half of 2013 resulted in "only" $20.76 billion in offering proceeds. That's down from $29 billion in 2012 and $27 billion in 2011.
Blogging on corporate and securities law issues affecting companies in North Texas and around the state. Exploring legal issues related to mergers and acquisitions, public offerings (including IPOs), private placements, venture capital, entity formation and corporate governance.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Fort Worth Business Press Article
Thank you to the Fort Worth Business Press for publishing my article titled "New SEC rules to permit general solicitation in private placements," which is available here.
As noted in previous blog posts, these new rules are a huge deal in the private capital markets.
As noted in previous blog posts, these new rules are a huge deal in the private capital markets.
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Amending and Restating a Texas Certificate of Formation Just Got Easier
Great news for corporate law practitioners in Texas. One of my pet peeves with regard to filings with the Secretary of State has been eliminated. Thanks to recently enacted Senate Bill 847, effective September 1, 2013, a restated certificate of formation is no longer required to "identify by reference or description each added, altered, or deleted provision." That provision is no longer part of Section 3.059 of the Texas Business Organizations Code.
The requirement to describe amendments of a certificate of formation was previously a thorn in my side because:
The requirement to describe amendments of a certificate of formation was previously a thorn in my side because:
- it is totally unnecessary - why does it matter what the certificate of formation used to say if it has been amended and restated?
- and if one person in a million decided that that absolutely had to know what changes had been made to the certificate of formation couldn't they take that project themselves - every version of the certificate of formation is publicly available?
- and most importantly, the standard for the description was too vague - how detailed of a description of the changes to the certificate is necessary to comply with the Texas Business Organizations Code? So Texas entities and their lawyers had to guess how much time to waste on complying with this silly requirement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)